Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9010017
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T02:20:58+00:00 2026-06-16T02:20:58+00:00

The Optimistic ConcurrencyException is not returned right. I tested this with the breeze ToDo

  • 0

The Optimistic ConcurrencyException is not returned right. I tested this with the breeze ToDo sample and my app.

This is what is returned if i provoke a an OptimisticConcurrencyException:

{"$id":"1","$type":"System.Web.Http.HttpError, System.Web.Http","Message":"An error has occurred."}

The ExceptionType is missing. In debug-mode in VS this works right.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T02:21:00+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 2:21 am

    @sascha – You beat me to it on the <customErrors> thing which works fine if you’re running in IIS (see Jimmy Bogard’s alternative if you are one of the very few who would self-host your Web Api).

    But I’m pretty sure it is the wrong thing to do ultimately. It is expedient for now but, as Jimmy says in his post, “It’s likely not something we want in production.” An app shouldn’t expose unfiltered exceptions to the client for routine stuff like optimistic concurrency or validation errors.

    I intend to find a better approach, most likely involving the HttpResponseException as described here. I’ll give strong consideration to a “Custom Exception Filter” for dealing with unhandled exceptions in a controlled manner.

    I don’t think that approach is something that belongs in Breeze itself. It strikes me as requiring an application specific solution … one that knows which exceptions should be exposed and how they should be phrased. But the mechanism would be good to teach. Once you know how to do it, you can roll your own custom exception handling … and leave the Web.config alone.

    Hoping to write this guidance soon. Feel free to beat me to it 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this atomic optimistic initializer class: type Atomic<T: IInterface> = class type TFactory
I'm not optimistic that this can be done without a stored procedure, but I'm
I saw Versioning and Optimistic Locking – combined with real-time get, this allows read-update-write
I was trying out the ToDo sample and ran into an unhandled Excaption while
We have strictly defined which relationships are CascadeType.MERGE in our app. This plays into
All my applications use field level optimistic concurrency. This works by keeping track of
I'm trying to implement exception handling for Optimistic lock type exceptions that are thrown
I suspect that this is impossible, but I'm trying to be optimistic... I'm running
Maybe this question has been anwsered, maybe not. I want to update an object
I have following mapping definitions: <class name=Role table=Role optimistic-lock=version > <id name=Id type=Int32 unsaved-value=0

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.