Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 245657
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:06:25+00:00 2026-05-11T21:06:25+00:00

The other day I found the FOUND_ROWS() ( here ) function in MySQL and

  • 0

The other day I found the FOUND_ROWS() (here) function in MySQL and it’s corresponding SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS option. The later looks especially useful (instead of running a second query to get the row count).

I’m wondering what speed impact there is by adding SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS to a query?

I’m guessing it will be much faster than runnning a second query to count the rows, but will it be a lot different. Also, I have found limiting a query to make it much faster (for example when you get the first 10 rows of 1000). Will adding SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS to a query with a small limit cause the query to run much slower?

I know I can test this, but I’m wondering about general practices here.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:06:26+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:06 pm

    To calculate SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS the query will be execute as if no LIMIT was set, but the result set sent to the client will obey the LIMIT.


    Update: for COUNT(*) operations which would be using only the index, SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS is slower (reference).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 168k
  • Answers 168k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Why not just: var el = $('<div class="selectors"></div>'); $container.append(el); ?… May 12, 2026 at 1:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could implement IList<T> yourself and keep two backing collections… May 12, 2026 at 1:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can find a lot goodies by reading Scott Hanselman's… May 12, 2026 at 1:43 pm

Related Questions

C# 3.0 introduced the var keyword. And when compiled, the compiler will insert the
Here's the scenario: I'm an SSIS virgin, but I found an excuse to start
I've really been struggling to make SQL Server into something that, quite frankly, it
Before i start id like to say ive posted this question as more of

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.