Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6123417
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T16:00:51+00:00 2026-05-23T16:00:51+00:00

The problem is this. I have: f :: MonadIO m => ReaderT FooBar m

  • 0

The problem is this. I have:

f :: MonadIO m => ReaderT FooBar m Answer;
f = (liftIO getArgs) >>= ...

I need to run this with modified arguments. However, since m is unknown, I cannot simply use

mapReaderT (withArgs args) :: ReaderT r IO b -> ReaderT r IO b

since I need somehow to transform (withArgs args) into m for all m.

One possibility I found is to define my own withArgs, thus:

import System.Environment (setArgs, freeArgv);
withArgv new_args act = do {
  pName <- liftIO System.Environment.getProgName;
  existing_args <- liftIO System.Environment.getArgs;
  bracket (liftIO $ setArgs new_args)
          (\argv -> do {
                      _ <- liftIO $ setArgs (pName:existing_args);
                      liftIO $ freeArgv argv;
                    })
          (const act);
};

withArgs xs act = do {
  p <- liftIO System.Environment.getProgName;
  withArgv (p:xs) act;
};

However, this is a kludge, and specific to one function — I would need to re-write every withX :: X -> IO a -> IO a, e.g. Control.Exception.handle

What, if any, is a better way to do this?

Edit: In the case of handle, I found Control.Monad.CatchIO. In the other case, I used yet another, briefer kludge (not worth posting) to avoid the kludge above. Still seeking a better solution!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T16:00:52+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:00 pm

    The monad-control package will do this. I think you want the function liftIOOp_ from Control.Monad.IO.Control.

    Specifically,

    liftIOOp_ (withArgs newArgs) f
    

    should do what you want. You can lift things like bracket too, with the liftIOOp function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this problem I'm hoping someone knows the answer to. I have an
I have this problem. I need to do the following: get todays date make
I have this problem with an app of a printer. I need to know
I have this problem where I need to design a Java package which is
I have this problem, when I run application I see listbox with items red,
I have this problem where I open Visual Studio and the internal windows are
i have this problem to find a particular xml node l have post this
I have this problem I've been trying to tackle for a while. I have
Ok I have this problem that I've never had before, it's really bugging me.
i have this problem: ms-access could not delete and i found a potential solution

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.