Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 875831
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:20:15+00:00 2026-05-15T11:20:15+00:00

The problem to model is this: A hierarchy of levels within an Army ,

  • 0

The problem to model is this:

A hierarchy of levels within an Army, starting with the national army in whole, through field armies, subunits, and eventually the individual men. Each level may involve links to one or more other classes such as General or Officer or whatever. The units within say a field army need to be able to communicate with each other, especially for purposes of modeling morale, cohesion, etc, as well as with those of any enemy field army (e.g. a unit routing in my army affects the enemy morale positively). Furthermore, each unit needs to communicate with those above and below it in the hierarchy (for obvious purposes).

I was thinking of having the links in the physical hierarchy represented by actual pointers (possibly bilateral) in each of these entities’ classes (e.g. army* in each unit and unit* or a whole collection of them in each army) and then making use of the observer design pattern to implement any communication in other cases (such as the case I mentioned above).

However, being no expert in design patterns or programming for that matter I do not know whether there is any other more efficient manner to do this. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:20:16+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:20 am

    There is a model/design pattern for communicating events between disparate entities that may not know of eachothers existence before the communication happens. The pattern is called ‘Publish/Subscribe’.

    Each entity sends events it wants to publish to a broker and tells the broker about what kinds of events it would be interested in. The broker handles making sure the subscribing entities learn of events they find interesting that are published.

    This is like the Observer pattern, but in the Observer pattern each interested entity subscribes individually to each entity it wants events from. I think this could result in a lot of overhead because that requires everybody to care about creation and destruction of things.

    Anyway, there is a nice Wikipedia article on Publish/Subscribe.

    I would use the Composite pattern (which basically means a tree of some form) for the individual armies. And possibly Observer for relationships up and down the hierarchy or with siblings. But Observer requires too much registering and unregistering for it to be workable in the general case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i've a problem with my tabularinline field. I have model like this class Product(models.Model):
I have isolated my problem in this fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/xYphz/ It uses the root model
I´m doing the Walkthrough: Mapping Inheritance - Table-per-Hierarchy (Entity Data Model Tools) . This
I have a model hierarchy that looks something like this: Office | +-- Person
This problem comes up quite a bit actually. Take this instance model view. I
I am trying to model a tree structure within django. This is a reduced
I have problem with model built like this: class Topping(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=30) class
I have problem with this code: file = tempfile.TemporaryFile(mode='wrb') file.write(base64.b64decode(data)) file.flush() os.fsync(file) # file.seek(0)
I'm running into problems implementing statuses for a model. This is probably due to
I've got an interesting box-model problem here. I have a header full of links,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.