Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 382089
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T15:08:55+00:00 2026-05-12T15:08:55+00:00

The purpose of ThreadLocal as given here states that the variable is local to

  • 0

The purpose of ThreadLocal as given here states that the variable is local to any Thread accessing an object containing the ThreadLocal variable. What difference does it make, in having a ThreadLocal variable as a member of a class and then making it local to a Thread, rather than having a local variable to the Thread itself?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T15:08:55+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 3:08 pm

    A thread is a unit of execution and so multiple thread can execute the same code at the same time. If multiple threads execute on an object/instance at the same time they will share the instance variables. Each thread will have its own local variables but it is difficult to share these across objects without passing parameters.

    It is best explained by way of an example. Say you have a Servlet that gets the logged in user and then executes some code.

    doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) {
      User user = getLoggedInUser(req);
      doSomething()
      doSomethingElse()
      renderResponse(resp)
    }
    

    Now what happens if the doSomething() methods needs access to the user object? You can’t make the user object an instance or static variable because each thread will then use the same user object. You could pass the user object around as a parameter but this quickly becomes messy and leaks user objects into every method call:

    doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) {
      User user = getLoggedInUser(req);
      doSomething(user)
      doSomethingElse(user)
      renderResponse(resp,user)
    }
    

    A more elegant solution is to put the user object into a ThreadLocal

    doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) {
      User user = getLoggedInUser(req);
      StaticClass.getThreadLocal().set(user)
      try {
        doSomething()
        doSomethingElse()
        renderResponse(resp)
      }
      finally {
        StaticClass.getThreadLocal().remove()
      }
    }
    

    Now any code that requires the user object at any time can get hold of it by extracting it from the thread local, without needing to resort to those pesky extra parameters:

    User user = StaticClass.getThreadLocal().get()
    

    If you use this approach be mindful to remove the objects again in a finally block. Otherwise the user object might hang around in environments that use a Thread Pool (like Tomcat app server).

    Edit: The code for static class

    class StaticClass {
      static private ThreadLocal<User> threadLocal = new ThreadLocal<>();
    
      static ThreadLocal<User> getThreadLocal() {
        return threadLocal;
      }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am aware that the purpose of volatile variables in Java is that writes
Purpose We're designing a Latin square (sudoku-like sequence) for an experimental design that needs
Purpose of the app: A simple app that draws a circle for every touch
What is the purpose of having two files that appear to do the same/similar
The purpose of the following code is that when the user is holding the
my purpose is to send a variable through a text link, but not in
My purpose is that to be able to let my application to talk in
What purpose does super.paintComponent(g) serve in this sample code? protected void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
What is the purpose of the Secondary key? Say I have a table that
The purpose of using a Javascript proxy for the Web Service using a service

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.