Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3321820
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:06:32+00:00 2026-05-17T23:06:32+00:00

The question says it all. I want to know if it a good idea

  • 0

The question says it all. I want to know if it a good idea to manually call the accepttext() or pfc_accepttext to force powerbuilder to accept the values in the datawindow fields.

The reason behind this question is that I have a datawindow in a popup window which contains some fields. When the user enters values in that fields and presses an OK button, the datawindow is saved and the popup window is closed. When the ok button is clicked, the last field isn’t properly accepting the input value. That’s why I was thinking of manually firing accepttext() or pfc_accepttext event.

Any help will be appreciated!!!

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:06:33+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:06 pm

    Yes, it is a very good idea to make sure a dw.accepttext() is fired prior to attempting to save any datawindow. Otherwise, like you pointed out, it may not save all the information the user enters unless they tab out of each field; which end users should not be expected to do.

    For more complicated windows/objects you could create a simple function for this, such as wf_accepttext() which contains all the dw.accepttext() calls for each datawindow that will need to be updated. Then you can just call that function before you attempt to update your datawindows.

    (Edit) Additional thoughts:

    Terry’s comment above reminded me of something I neglected to include in my initial answer. accepttext() returns -1 if a field’s validation fails.
    So if you make a custom function to handle all your accepttext() calls, make sure you write it to handle this return code. Something such as this should be sufficient:

    /* wf_accepttext() */
    if dw_foo.accepttext() = -1 then return false
    if dw_bar.accepttext() = -1 then return false
    // etc..
    return true
    

    This way, at the top of your save function, let’s call it wf_save(), you can do this:

    /* wf_save() */
    if not wf_accepttext() then return false
    /* any other save validation and the dw.update() goes below here */
    

    And in the event that something doesn’t validate, wf_save() will bail, and your itemchanged event should have code to handle the rest.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The question says it all. Basically, I just want to know the alternative for
Question says it all. Does anyone know if the following... size_t div(size_t value) {
The question says it all: I want to change information about datasources on multiple
Question says it all really. I want to be able to display something at
The question says it all, really. I know a (Scala) Monad looks like this:
Question says it all. I'm just having trouble figuring this out. What i'm trying
Question says it all. I tried browsing through the latest tag but could not
Question says it all. Some quick code examples of usage would be nice.. thanks!
The question says it all. I am looking for a build.xml file browser where
The question says it all, I am trying to use an external library in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.