Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8418513
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T02:21:18+00:00 2026-06-10T02:21:18+00:00

The reason for my slightly odd question is simple. I’d like to run my

  • 0

The reason for my slightly odd question is simple. I’d like to run my console as 32-bit on my dev box simply because of the convenience of edit-and-continue, which can be a time-saver for silly mistakes – just fix them on the spot and go on.

But I’d also like not to have to change the build configuration, because it’s under source control and I’ll forget to set it back to “any cpu” and we’ll end up deploying the wrong image version if I set this to “x86”.

Is there a way that let’s me get the best of both worlds?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T02:21:20+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 2:21 am

    In the end, I opted for the following solution:

    Add a new console app project to my solution called 32bitLauncher. Set the build configuration on this one to target x86 only. Then make my various batch classes and their main methods public, and define multiple entry points in the launcher, like this:

    class Prefill
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            PrefillBatch.Main(args);
        }
    }
    
    
    class Correspondence
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            CorrespondenceBatch.Main(args);
        }
    }
    

    Now I can select the startup object in the property pages for the launcher when I want to switch between batches, actually more convenient than changing the startup project (because I anyway need to go into the property pages to set command-line arguments). This forces 32-bit execution even on 64-bit hardware, and lo and behold, I can edit-and-continue!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

slightly related to this question here . My problem: I am writing a bit
Reason I ask is because they suggest not to commit dependencies on your repos.
The reason I am asking this as a separate question to the multitude of
The reason I want to sign the dll is because I want to add
The reason I need the inner class to be non static is because I
The reason I'm asking this is because there is a validation in OpenERP that
The reason why I am stuck on this is because of how C handles
I did not knew that this simple thing would be slightly complicated. I have
I would like to know if there is a fundamental reason for limiting the
This is probably a really easy question to answer, but for some reason I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.