The reason I ask is that you can cast a nullable type to a regular type with the Value property. That makes me think that the regular type is just wrapped up in the nullable type.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The reason I ask is that you can cast a nullable type to a regular type with the Value property. That makes me think that the regular type is just wrapped up in the nullable type.
Yes, it is a generic struct:
This is probably more confusing if you’ve only seen the
T?syntax – but that is just syntactic sugar, the compiler is changing it toNullable<T>.Source: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b3h38hb0.aspx , http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1t3y8s4s.aspx