Question

The relationship among const_multi_array_ref, multi_array_ref and multi_array is as follows:

• multi_array_ref is derived from const_multi_array_ref
• multi_array is derived from multi_arry_ref

However, the destructors of const_multi_array_ref and multi_array_ref are non-virtual. In fact they do not have an explicitly implemented destructor. Only multi_array has a one. Does this imply the following usage is not recommended?

multi_array_ref<float, 2> * = new multi_array<float, 2>(extents[3][3]);

If so, why?

Answer 1

multi_array library classes aren’t designed for dynamic polymorphism. They don’t have any virtual functions, so it doesn’t look reasonable to make destructor virtual too. It’s common STL-like design, multi_array_ref is just used as unified interface adapter for data owning and non-owning cases.

Your usage sample is highly not recommended – it will lead to memory leak because multi_array destructor will not be executed on delete call.

But it will be safe to access multi_array instance via reference or pointer to multi_array_ref.