Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 948063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:11:01+00:00 2026-05-15T23:11:01+00:00

The Scala language specification section 6.19 says: A for comprehension for (p <- e)

  • 0

The Scala language specification section 6.19 says:

A for comprehension for (p <- e) yield e0 is translated to e.map { case p => e0 }

So…

scala> val l : List[Either[String, Int]] = List(Left("Bad"), Right(1))
l: List[Either[String,Int]] = List(Left(Bad), Right(1))

scala> for (Left(x) <- l) yield x
res5: List[String] = List(Bad)

So far so good:

scala> l.map { case Left(x) => x }
<console>:13: warning: match is not exhaustive!
missing combination          Right

       l.map { case Left(x) => x }
             ^
scala.MatchError: Right(1)
    at $anonfun$1.apply(<console>:13)
    at ...

Why does the second version not work? Or rather, why does the first version work?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:11:01+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:11 pm

    If you use pattern matching in your for-comprehension the compiler will actually insert a call to filter with an instanceOf-check before applying the map.

    EDIT:

    Also in section 6.19 it says:

    A generator p <- e followed by a guard if g is translated to a single generator p <- e.withFilter((x1, …, xn) => g ) where x1, …, xn are the free variables of p.

    A generator is defined earlier on as:

    Generator ::= Pattern1 ‘<-’ Expr [Guard]

    When inspecting the bytecode you will see the call to filter preceding the call to map.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using Scala's command line REPL: def foo(x: Int): Unit = {} def foo(x: String):
I came across existential quantification over values in the Scala Language Specification (3.2.10 Existential
In Scala, is it possible to get the string representation of a type at
While playing around with regexps in Scala I wrote something like this: scala> val
I'm working with a map in Scala and doing the usual if there's no
I just recently started learning the Scala language and would like to do it
Scala is a peculiar programming language in that it targets both JVM and the
I've been learning scala and I gotta say that it's a really cool language.
Possible Duplicate: What's the (hidden) cost of lazy val? (Scala) Scala allows the definition
What are the most commonly held misconceptions about the Scala language, and what counter-examples

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.