Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 845923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T06:31:56+00:00 2026-05-15T06:31:56+00:00

The scenario is as follows: Create an instance of a class (std::map) and sore

  • 0

The scenario is as follows:

  1. Create an instance of a class (std::map) and
    sore it as global variable.
  2. Spawn threads.
  3. Threads read and use the same global
    instance of the class (call methods, access members etc)
  4. All spawned threads quit
  5. Global class instance is destroyed

No mutex used, no spawn thread modifies the global class instance.

Is this OK?

Thank You

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T06:31:56+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:31 am

    Typically yes, but it’s not a hard guarantee.

    The core problem is that you need a memory barrier to make sure that the first thread writes back all data from registers to memory. However, it is very likely that this will happen when you create the second thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a scenario where we need to use the Quickbooks SDK to create
The scenario is as follows. My Order model has an after_create that contacts a
The scenario is as follows, I have 3 objects (i simplified the names) named
My scenario is as follows. I have 7 tabs (one for each day) using
The architecture for this scenario is as follows: I have a table of items
Scenario A : To share a read/write block of memory between two processes running
My scenario is as follows: I have a client-server application. The client is deployed
My scenario is as follows: I have a table of data (handful of fields,
I got stuck with this scenario. Let me explain as follows. I have a
I'm trying to cancel a downloading operation. My scenario is as follows: When the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.