Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7504351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T21:32:44+00:00 2026-05-29T21:32:44+00:00

The script has to verify if one predefined IP is present in a big

  • 0

The script has to verify if one predefined IP is present in a big array of IPs. Currently I code that function like this (saying that “ips” is my array of IP and “ip” is the predefined ip)

ips.each do |existsip|
  if ip == existsip
    puts "ip exists"
    return 1
  end
end
puts "ip doesn't exist"
return nil

Is there a faster way to do the same thing?

Edit : I might have wrongly expressed myself. I can do array.include? but what I’d like to know is : Is array.include? the method that will give me the fastest result?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T21:32:45+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 9:32 pm

    You can use Set. It is implemented on top of Hash and will be faster for big datasets – O(1).

    require 'set'
    s = Set.new ['1.1.1.1', '1.2.3.4']
    # => #<Set: {"1.1.1.1", "1.2.3.4"}> 
    s.include? '1.1.1.1'
    # => true 
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

[cross posted again to Mahalo answers] My Perl/Tk script has an initial spreadsheet like
I have a script that has PHP on it, and a link that goes
I have A Script that has a Select statement to go to multiple sub
I have a python script that has to launch a shell command for every
I'm writing a script that has to move some file around, but unfortunately it
I have a PHP script that has a runtime of 34 seconds. But it
I have one piece of Cocoa code I wrote that takes in an XML
In a bash script I need to verify that the user inputs actual numbers
To ensure a script has at least version X of perl, you can do
I need to check whether the user executing the script has administrative privileges on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.