Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6534873
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T10:18:13+00:00 2026-05-25T10:18:13+00:00

The title is probably confusing. Suppose we have the following set up; class A

  • 0

The title is probably confusing.

Suppose we have the following set up;

class A
{
public:
    virtual void fn() = 0;
};

class B
{
public:
    virtual int fn() {};
};

class C: public A, public B
{
};

Is there any way to define A::fn in class C?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T10:18:13+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:18 am

    No. This is not possible. It will always conflict with either of the fn().

    The syntax of fn() are different,

    void fn();  // in A
    

    and in B is,

    int fn();  // in B
    

    You have to make those syntax same in A and B to let C implement the fn(). Demo.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The title is probably not very clear. I have the following example in mind:
I realise there have probably been a few questions with a title similar to
Title might be a bit confusing, so let me explain. I have a website
There's probably an obvious way to do this that I'm missing, so sorry for
The phrasing of the title may be a little confusing. I have an app
Probably not the best title, but I'll explain: I have an array of objects
I apologize for the probably confusing title, but I wasn't quite sure how to
Ok, the title is probably confusing. I need to use a case statement to
The title is probably a little ambiguous. There is a given number. There is
Title probably doesn't make a lot of sense, so I'll start with some code:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.