Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6126707
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T16:24:35+00:00 2026-05-23T16:24:35+00:00

The title may be a little confusing so I’ll explain. Say you had this

  • 0

The title may be a little confusing so I’ll explain. Say you had this call chain…

public DoWork(index) >> private DoWorkHelper(index) >> private CheckIndex(index)

Now if you call DoWork, it traverses the calls down to CheckIndex, adding each deeper call to the call stack.

Now if someone calls DoWork with a bad value for index, it throws the exception all the way down at CheckIndex, and currently, that’s where the debugger breaks. You then have to walk back up the call stack to see the real offender was that someone passed bad data to DoWork.

Now back in the VB6 days, you could simply decorate DoWorkHelper and CheckIndex with an attribute to say ‘If any exception is thrown inside me, don’t highlight me, but rather my caller because they were the ones that passed me bad crap!’ So in this case, the code would break inside DoWork with the call to DoWorkHeper highlighted.

There was also a setting to disable this so for deeper debugging purposes it could still be thrown at CheckIndex, the level where it actually occurred, but half the time, breaking down there tells you nothing because you don’t know how you got there without walking back up the call stack.

Think of it a way to decorate your code to say when you hit an exception, auto-traverse the call stack to the point where the bad value actually tells you something useful.

Note this is similar to ‘Break On All Exceptions’ except you’re handling this via decoration. Plus, you’re not setting to break on a specific type of exception (e.g. all null reference exceptions, etc.) but rather a specific method! (or more accurately, the one that called the decorated method.)

So does C# or .NET in general have this?


Update

While I credit Dark Falcon for the answer since he directed me there, I’ve added a more detailed explanation about what all the attributes mean, and in what context. Check it out below.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T16:24:35+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:24 pm

    Please see the Just My Code option. You need to decorate DoWorkHelper with DebuggerHiddenAttribute or DebuggerNonUserCodeAttribute.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The title may be a little confusing, but I don't know how else to
The phrasing of the title may be a little confusing. I have an app
The title may sound a little strange, so I'll try to explain my problem:
I understand the title may be a little vague, but, hopefully, I can explain
The title may be a bit vague. This is what I mean: Say I
I realise that the title may be very confusing, so to explain what I
Ok so my question title may have been a little confusing. Here's my example:
The title may not really explain what I'm really trying to get at, couldn't
That title may need some work. Perhaps after reading this, you may be able
Ok so the title may have been confusing so i have posted 2 code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.