Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8541761
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T11:54:15+00:00 2026-06-11T11:54:15+00:00

The void keyword is only used as a return type to indicate that a

  • 0

The void keyword is only used as a return type to indicate that a method does not return a value.
But why can’t void be used as a formal parameter in method definition to indicate that it does not accept any arguments, like:

void fun(void){
    ...
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T11:54:17+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 11:54 am

    It’s unnecessary. If a method does not have arguments, specifying an empty argument set () is sufficient.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am used to C, where header files usually only contain declarations and not
I am being told that I can't use the 'this' keyword in a class
I'm trying to find any information about template keyword used as disambiguator, but there
Coming from a Java perspective I was surprised to find that you can only
Imagine the following interface in C#: interface IFoo { void Bar(); } How can
Coming from a C++ background, I'm used to sticking the const keyword into function
so i was testing with synchronized keyword. Here is an example that I tried:
I am unsure if the volatile keyword should also be used for non-primitives. I
Instead of template <typename T> void func(T arg) {/* something */} why can't we
Is there a kind of alternating params for method parameters? I like the keyword

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.