Question

The Windows API DuplicateHandle()
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724251(VS.85).aspx
Requires the Object handle to be duplicated and a handle to both the original process AND the other process that you want to use the duplicated handle in.

I am assuming that if I have two UNRELATED processes, I could call DuplicateHandle() in either one so long as I had the required handles available?

My Question is about using a Pipe to communicate between the two processes to achieve this with an Event.

In the first process I CreateEvent(). Now I want to use WaitForSingleObject() in the second process.

If I try to duplicate the handle in the first process, I will need to first send the second process handle to the first process via the pipe, duplicate the handle and then send the handle over to the second process?

Alternativly, I could begin by sending the first process handle and the Event handle to the second process and just duplicate it there.

Is there a reason I should choose one over the other?

To add a wrinkle, the Event handle is actually inherited from the parent process that actually called the first process (which is a CGI application). If that Event handle was created with HANDLE_DO_NOT_DUPLICATE (something like that) then can I in fact use DuplicateHandle() to duplicate it for the second process?

Response:

Well I could create a new NAMED event in the first process and find it in the second process as suggested, but I am trying to DUPLICATE the event that was created in the parent of the first process and foreward it to the second process. This event is not a named event so I need to use DuplicateHandle().

I am using a pipe for the IPC. I am realizing that DuplicateHandle() will have to be called in the first process because the event handle is out of context when sent to the second process.

        hProcPseudo  = GetCurrentProcess() 

    //Then call either:
        lpRealHandle = OpenProcess( PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE, 0, hProcPseudo ) 
//This fails with GetLastError= 87 - The parameter is incorrect ???
// same thing with PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS ??


    //OR
        lRet = DuplicateHandle( hProcPseudo, hProcPseudo, hProcPseudo, lpRealHandle, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS, 0, 0 )

    //then I can Duplicate my Event Handle in the first thread with:
        lRet = DuplicateHandle( hLocalProcess, hEvent, lpRealHandle, hDupEvent, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS, 0, 0)

The second process converts its handle with DuplicateHandle() detailed above converting

hProcPseudo= 4294967295

to

hProcess= 152

Then I pass this process handle to the first process via the named pipe.
In the first process (where the event handle is valid) I call Duplicate handle:

DuplicateHandle( hFirstProcess, hEvent, hSecondProc, hDupEvent, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS, 0, 0)

Unfortunatly I get the error:

DuplicateHandle hPipeFCGI GetLastError= 6 – The handle is invalid.

Further testing (substituting hFirstProcess) reveals it is hSecondProc that is invalid!??

Big Mystery.

Answer 1

Use a named pipe or mailslots for IPC, this should work reliably for your purpose. If you need to wait, use named wait handles.

Otherwise, I’d choose to do DuplicateHandle in the second process in order to set the handle ownership correctly.