Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8451169
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T11:09:53+00:00 2026-06-10T11:09:53+00:00

Theoretical question only – why i can’t write such code: auto auto foo =

  • 0

Theoretical question only – why i can’t write such code:

auto auto foo = 0;

First auto keyword – storage class specifier (yeah, i know that it’s useless and deprecated in C++11), second auto keyword – auto type-specifier.

So what’s wrong?

And again – i don’t really want to use this in real code.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T11:09:55+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 11:09 am

    The auto storage class specifier is not “useless and deprecated in C++11,” it has been removed entirely. The auto keyword is no longer a storage class specifier and cannot be used as one.

    In C++11, auto is a simple type specifier.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

More of a theoretical question, but wouldn't it make more sense to have only
This is kinda theoretical question, I was looking at someone else' code (below) and
The question can be seen as both practical and theoretical. I am designing a
first of all: my question is very theoretical. Even if I post an example,
I can't find any info regarding my question. This is more theoretical question. For
First of -yes this IS a homework- but it's primarily a theoretical question rather
I have a slightly theoretical question that I want to clear up before I
I have a very theoretical question: Is there a way to ban the use
it's a theoretical question: suppose I come up with an outstanding new scripting language
this is just theoretical question. I use JDBC with my Java applications for using

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.