Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 575403
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:56:12+00:00 2026-05-13T13:56:12+00:00

There are a few cases of source incompatibilities with Scala 2.8.0. For example, creating

  • 0

There are a few cases of source incompatibilities with Scala 2.8.0. For example, creating an anonymous Seq once required defining the abstract def elements : Iterator[A], which is now called def iterator : Iterator[A].

To me, a “brute force” solution is to create two branches that align to the different major scala versions.

Are there general techniques so that code like this will compile under both systems?

// Note: this code resembles techniques used by xml.NodeSeq
trait FooSeq extends Seq[ Foo ] {
   def internal : Seq[ Foo ] 
   def elements = internal.elements
   def iterator = internal.iterator // Only compiles in 2.8
                                    // need to remove for 2.7.X
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:56:13+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:56 pm

    There are a few cases where usage is simply different and you must change. But in almost all cases–such as the elements code above–the 2.7 style is simply deprecated in 2.8, not gone altogether. If you’re okay leaving your 2.8 users with deprecation warnings (edit: if they compile your code, otherwise you’ll just have the warnings yourself), just implement the new features in terms of the old:

    def iterator = internal.elements
    

    Otherwise, I would recommend what you call the brute force solution. Use a sufficiently clever VCS so that you don’t actually have to write much code twice (Git, Bazaar, Mercurial) and branch.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Though in general I like case-sensitivity in my database, there are a few times
we are experiencing a few problems with the IDisposable pattern. In this case there
in my page there are few hidden field which are filled with the correct
It looks like there a few working solutions for using custom true type fonts
I have a webpage where there are few text fields to be filled up
I'm converting an old VB form to .NET, and there a few Buttons which
I know how to use locks in my app, but there still few things
I have an application that's locked down using forms authentication. There are few nightly
There are a few examples on unobtrusive events for pure JS. Most of questions
There are a few pages here addressing usage of jQuery with .net masterpages -

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.