Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7555247
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T11:33:25+00:00 2026-05-30T11:33:25+00:00

There are matices A(n,1), B(n,1) and the following condition inside a loop for i=1:m

  • 0

There are matices A(n,1), B(n,1) and the following condition inside a loop

for i=1:m
   if ( A(i, 1) > error )
      B(i,1) = 0;
   else
      B(i,1) = exp (-A(i,1) / 100)
   end
end

How to rewrite this condition without using any loop? Is it possible something like that

 if ( A(:, 1) > error )
      B(:,1) = 0;
   else
      B(:,1) = exp (-A(:,1) / 100)
 end
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T11:33:28+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 11:33 am

    Use logical indexing:

    idxs = (A > error);
    B( idxs) = 0;
    B(~idxs) = exp(-A(~idxs) / 100);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There is a column that exists in 2 tables. In table 1, this column
There are nice SO question and answers about this issue, but these options didn't
I know there is something wrong with the following reasoning but I'm not sure
Problem I would like to compute the following using numpy or scipy: Y =
I'm generating two matrices using the following function (note some code is omitted): srand(2007);
I've been following the Microsoft Direct3D11 tutorials but using C# and SlimDX. I'm trying
there is a topic about this subject which is working with arrays but I
Is there a way to perform row wise operations on matrices in octave ?
There is a moment in my app, that I need to force to show
There's a Rails 3.2.3 web application which doesn't use any database. But in spite

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.