Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6627867
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T22:03:51+00:00 2026-05-25T22:03:51+00:00

There are more operators that work when we add __ to them too. what

  • 0

There are more operators that work when we add __ to them too.
what does __ mean?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T22:03:52+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:03 pm

    An identifier with double underscores is reserved for the implementation. typeof is a compiler specific extension to the language, so naming it __typeof ensures no user code has an identifier with the same name

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If there are more than one rows in my source that do not match
Is there more elegant (less code) way of find a matrix OUT, with colSums(OUT)<=a
There are more than one solution for finding the-number-of-digits in a given number. For
There are more or less straightforward ways to emit or listen signals of existing
Is there a more elegant solution to convert an ' Arraylist ' into a
Is there are more efficient way than the following for selecting the third parent?
Is there anything more compact (or otherwise better) than this? <x:Array x:Key=titles Type=System:String> <System:String>Mr.</System:String>
is there a more simple way to get combobox (WinForms) selected items text? string
Is there a more railsy way to do this query in rails 3? scope
Is there a more efficient (in terms of memory foot print) binding to datagrid

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.