Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 650095
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:00:56+00:00 2026-05-13T22:00:56+00:00

There are two classes: A and B . There are algorithms for converting from

  • 0

There are two classes: A and B. There are algorithms for converting from type A to type B and back. We cannot touch the source code of them. Can I write an implicit conversion between the two types?

Example code which should work:

B CalculateSomething(double x)
{
    A a(x);
    a.DoSomethingComplicated();
    return a;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:00:56+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:00 pm

    No, I don’t think so. Implicit conversion is usually coded with an overloaded operator. It is done for base types too. As you can’t modify A and B code there is no way to tell the compiler how to do that. Your snippet will get an error.

    You have to do explicit conversion. Just

    return helper.convertToB(a);
    

    my2c

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In the Code Below there are Two Classes. One Object of type two is
There are two classes, let's call them X and O. A number of elements
http://pastebin.com/1btVw8Cb There are two classes in the above code. So above is my code
My program involves drawing triangles where i click them. There are two classes, Ecad
There are two classes. MainActivity, in which i set the view, and ClassX from
There are two classes. Class B dervied from A. class A { } class
Here is my question - There are two classes Order and PaymentType . An
I have a problem. There are two classes: struct Base { Base* retain() {
I have a class Field of which there are two sub-classes AccountField and DecimalField
Is there any possibility to split classes for a two files like in C++?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.