Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6349691
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T21:39:55+00:00 2026-05-24T21:39:55+00:00

There is a lack of some predicates in one Prolog implementations, that are available

  • 0

There is a lack of some predicates in one Prolog implementations, that are available in others.

We can implement lacking predicates, let’s call this “Prolog Compatibility Layer”.

Do you know “Prolog Compatibility Layers” for Prolog (especially for GNU-Prolog) ?

Please structure answers in following way:

  • Title with link.
  • “Implemented for” – prolog implementation you might like to use
  • “Compatibility with” – prolog implementation for which compatibility layer is done
  • “Functions” – list of compatibility functions (you can bold yours favourites)
  • “Additional info” – comments, requirements, limitations etc.
  • “License” – license info

P.S. Question inspired by another question : Prolog syntax problem.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T21:39:55+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:39 pm

    YAP, SWI and GNU Prolog compatibility layer

    • GNU Prolog compatibility layer
    • SWI Prolog Compatibility layer
    • YAP Prolog compatibility layer

    Implementated for: GNU-Prolog, SWI Prolog, YAP Prolog.

    Compatibility with: SWI-Prolog and other Prologs

    Description: (GNU Compat.) “implements many essential predicates found in SWI Prolog
    and many other Prolog implementations that aren’t available in GNU Prolog.”

    Functions: (GNU Compat.) not/1, is_list/1, succ/2, sformat/3, string/1, is_codes/1, arithmetic_function, eval_arith/2, downcase_atom/2, forall/2, flag/3, between/3, gensym/2, time/1, if/2, if/3, if/4

    Additional info: (GNU Compat.) “Additionally, you need to include lists.pl from the SWI distribution.”

    License: GNU public license

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What really surprises me is lack of some essential functionality in Finder, when one
There are some particular API's in Java that make it very good. However I
I realize that there are many questions similar to this one, but having looked
Is it lack of time, some technical problem or is there a reason why
I want to define my own datatype that can hold a single one of
Are there any empirical studies that show the impact of refactoring (or lack of
Is there support in Ruby for (for lack of a better word) non-escaped (verbatim)
Due to the lack of clientaccesspolicy.xml, there appears to be problems with using Amazon
How much less libraries are there for Mono than for Java? I lack the
There is a conversion process that is needed when migrating Visual Studio 2005 web

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.