Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6693799
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T06:01:40+00:00 2026-05-26T06:01:40+00:00

There is a phantom empty tag ( <> ) showing up in IE’s developer

  • 0

There is a phantom empty tag (<>) showing up in IE’s developer tools HTML tab.

Here’s a snippet of the actual HTML source, with a few irrelevant portions removed:

<td><img src="1.jpg"></td>
<!--start mo script-->
<div id="mo">
<script type="text/javascript" src="mo.js"></script>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout('timeOutMO()', 5000);
function timeOutMO() { 
   document.getElementById("mo").innerHTML = "";
}
</script>
<!--end mo script-->
<td><img src="2.jpg"></td>

In both Firefox’s Firebug and Chrome’s debugger, the nodes are shown as expected, with the <td>, <div>, <script>, and <td> nodes as siblings.

But in IE’s debugger, I get a phantom empty node that’s messing things up. It looks like this:

<td>
   <img src="1.jpg">
</td>
<!--start mo script-->
<>
   <div id="mo">
      <script type="text/javascript" src="mo.js"></script>
   </div>
   <script type="text/javascript">...</script>
   <!--end mo script-->
</>
<td>
   <img src="2.jpg">
</td>

IE is basically treating the div and script inside the empty tag not as siblings of the td tags but as nephews and nieces.

Anybody know why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T06:01:41+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:01 am

    What you are doing violates the HTML standard. Every browser will handle strange cases like those differently. Why not wrap it in a td?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There are a few ways to get class-like behavior in javascript, the most common
on this page in IE 8, there is the famous phantom element bug. I
Is there way to optionally compile dependency from source (svn) instead of using the
There's a lot of threads here about converting br/> or preserving newlines across different
There are a few posts about this, but after hours of searching I still
I haven't used PhantomReferences. There seems to be very few good examples of real-world
There is a conversion process that is needed when migrating Visual Studio 2005 web
There are two weird operators in C#: the true operator the false operator If
There are two popular closure styles in javascript. The first I call anonymous constructor
There is previous little on the google on this subject other than people asking

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.