Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 619965
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:42:42+00:00 2026-05-13T18:42:42+00:00

There is a sequence for FORM(some UI) should get downloaded using service. Currently, this

  • 0

There is a sequence for FORM(some UI) should get downloaded using service.
Currently, this download is in a BackgroundWorker Thread.
Now, since the performance is slow… We decided to categories the FORMS into 2 and start downloading parallely using another BackgroundWorker on top of the existing Thread.

Now, the scenario is the either of this BackgroundWorker should wait for other to complete.
So, how to implement it.

I tried with AutoResetEvent. but, i could not achieve this.

Any help is appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:42:43+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:42 pm

    I don’t think that the scenario is really that one BackgroundWorker should wait for another. What you really want is to fire some UI event after (and only after) both of them complete. It’s a subtle but important difference; the second version is a lot easier to code.

    public class Form1 : Form
    {
        private object download1Result;
        private object download2Result;
    
        private void BeginDownload()
        {
            // Next two lines are only necessary if this is called multiple times
            download1Result = null;
            download2Result = null;
    
            bwDownload1.RunWorkerAsync();
            bwDownload2.RunWorkerAsync();
        }
    
        private void bwDownload1_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender,
            RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
        {
            download1Result = e.Result;
            if (download2Result != null)
                DisplayResults();
        }
    
        private void bwDownload2_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender,
            RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
        {
            download2Result = e.Result;
            if (download1Result != null)
                DisplayResults();
        }
    
        private void DisplayResults()
        {
            // Do something with download1Result and download2Result
        }
    }
    

    Note that those object references should be strongly-typed, I just used object because I don’t know what you’re downloading.

    This is really all you need; the RunWorkerCompleted event runs in the foreground thread so you actually don’t need to worry about synchronization or race conditions in there. No need for lock statements, AutoResetEvent, etc. Just use two member variables to hold the results, or two boolean flags if the result of either can actually be null.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 366k
  • Answers 366k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you are sending objects, you have to really be… May 14, 2026 at 4:40 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer log4net has a known issue of referencing a System.Web component… May 14, 2026 at 4:40 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Scalability twisted.enterprise.adbapi isn't necessarily an interface for talking to databases… May 14, 2026 at 4:40 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.