Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
There is an existing question regarding difference between Mutex and Critical section but it does not deal with Locks also.
So i want to know whether Critical sections can be used for thread synchronisation between processes.
Also what is meant by signalled states and non-signalled states
In Windows critical sections are (mostly) implemented in user mode, and a mutex will switch context to kernel mode (which is slow). If a thread terminates while owning a mutex, the mutex is said to be abandoned. The state of the mutex is set to signaled, and the next waiting thread gets ownership. In the same situation with a critical section all other threads will remain blocked. Critical sections cannot be named so you cannot use them to synchronize several processes.