Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1081673
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T22:11:55+00:00 2026-05-16T22:11:55+00:00

there is more elegant (pythonic + effective) way to find word on given position?

  • 0

there is more elegant (pythonic + effective) way to find word on given position?

FIRST_WORD = re.compile(r'^(\w+)', re.UNICODE) 
LAST_WORD = re.compile(r'(\w+)$', re.UNICODE)

def _get_word(self, text, position):
    """
    Get word on given position
    """
    assert position >= 0
    assert position < len(text)

    # get second part of word
    # slice string and get first word
    match = FIRST_WORD.search(text[position:])
    assert match is not None
    postfix = match.group(1)

    # get first part of word, can be empty
    # slice text and get last word
    match2 = LAST_WORD.search(text[:position])
    if match2 : prefix = match2.group(1)
    else : prefix = ''

    return prefix + postfix


#                                  | 21.
>>> _get_word("Hello, my name is Earl.", 21)
Earl
>>> _get_word("Hello, my name is Earl.", 20)
Earl

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T22:11:55+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:11 pm

    Here’s how I’d do it:

    s = "Hello, my name is Earl."
    def get_word(text, position):
        words = text.split()
        characters = -1
        for word in words:
            characters += len(word)
            if characters > = position:
                return word
    >>> get_word(s, 21)
    Earl.
    

    Stripping off the punctuation can be done with ''.strip() or regular expressions or something hacky like

    for c in word:
        final += c if c.lower() in 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there more elegant (less code) way of find a matrix OUT, with colSums(OUT)<=a
Is there a more elegant way to write this statement? I find myself writing
I'm wondering if there is a more elegant way to do this: $foo =
I was wondering if there is a more elegant way to do IN() queries
I'm a beginner in Flex so there must be more elegant way of doing
I would like to ask if there is a more elegant way to write
Is there an elegant way to make whitespace string. To be more precise, I'm
Is there more elegant way of doing lazy evaluation than the following: pattern='$x and
Is there a more elegant way to do what I'm doing below? That is,
Very short question: Is there a more elegant way to do this: Object tmp;

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.