Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1057137
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T17:49:13+00:00 2026-05-16T17:49:13+00:00

There is some precedent for search-engine-ranking-related questions on StackOverflow, so please don’t close this

  • 0

There is some precedent for search-engine-ranking-related questions on StackOverflow, so please don’t close this question. It’s programming-related to the extent that HTML META tags can be called “programming”.

Here’s the problem:

We make FogBugz, the software project planning and bug tracking suite.

Either we did a great job with our old documentation or a crummy job with our new documentation, but for most of the popular searches on FogBugz terms, documentation for our old versions comes up.

Here’s an example. For context, our current FogBugz version is FogBugz 7. The top two results for that search are for FogBugz 5, which is positively ancient.

As best I can tell, there are several options for getting these results out of the top slots, but each has problems:

  • A NOINDEX tag, but what happens if someone is actually searching for help on an old version?
  • Finding the incoming links to the old documentation and placing a NOFOLLOW on them to deprive the old docs of PageRank. Problem here is that it’s really fiddly to find the links to the content, rather than changing the content itself.
  • The unavailable_after tag, which is just a time-delayed NOINDEX, with the same problem of removal rather than demotion.

I just want these old documentation versions to stop competing with our current versions, without being completely unavailable.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T17:49:14+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:49 pm

    An approach I used in the past (3 years ago)

    Change the URL to your old documentation, and change your own links to point to the new url. e.g. abc.com/docs/fogzbugz/v5/xyz becomes abc.com/docs/fogzbugz/ancient/v5/xyz

    Using the old URLs, implement a 301 redirection to your new v7 content. e.g. a request to abc.com/docs/fogzbugz/v5/GettingStarted.html is redirected to abc.com/docs/fogzbugz/v7/GettingStarted.html

    In this way, existing links from external sites will take browsers to the latest documentation, and inform indexing robots that the page has moved.

    Google will find the new links to your old documentation by indexing your site, but there will be no external links, thus reducing page rank.

    Google will also find the new links to your new documentation, and as more sites link to it, its page rank will increase and so take priority.

    This worked for me on a small scale (100 or so pages) site, and visitor attempts to view the old content rapidly dropped off.

    If a user does land on a v5 page, how about the MSDN approach of explicitly stating the version that the page describes, and providing links to the equivalent topic in the v6 and v7 docs?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there some built-in way to share files between Xen guests? I don't currently
Is there some means of querying the system tables to establish which tables are
Is there some way I can use URLs like: http://www.blog.com/team-spirit/ instead of http://www.blog.com/?p=122 in
Is there some way to block access from a referrer using a .htaccess file
Is there some way to hide the browser toolbar / statusbar etc in current
Is there some rare language construct I haven't encountered (like the few I've learned
Are there some principles of organizing classes into namespaces? For example is it OK
Is there some reasonably cross platform way to create a thumbnail image given a
Is there some way to cache a generated report in the reporting services, so
Is there some way I can define String[int] to avoid using String.CharAt(int) ?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.