Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 633439
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:11:10+00:00 2026-05-13T20:11:10+00:00

There is sometimes a problem with running out of memory when it got fragmented.

  • 0

There is sometimes a problem with running out of memory when it got fragmented.

Is it possible to find the largest free memoryblock ?
I use Delphi 2007 with FastMM. Developing on Windows XP running app on Windows 2003.

Regards

EDIT:
I could add the info that the app is running on a server with 32 GB memory on a Windows Server 2003 x64. But the app is a 32 bit application so the theoretical max allocated memory for each instance is 2 GB. Many instances is run at once. I do not think it is the total physical memory that is to little. I guess when started the app got a 32 bit virtual memory space. This can then be too fragmented during runtime.

I also found the method FastGetHeapStatus that returns a THeapStatus with some fields for free memory. Maybe I could use those.

EDIT2:
I found this How to get the largest available continues memory block.
The code is C but maybe it could be translated to Delphi.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:11:11+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:11 pm

    This is the translation to Delphi code that you wanted:

    function GetLargestFreeMemRegion(var AAddressOfLargest: pointer): LongWord;
    var
      Si: TSystemInfo;
      P, dwRet: LongWord;
      Mbi: TMemoryBasicInformation;
    begin
      Result := 0;
      AAddressOfLargest := nil;
      GetSystemInfo(Si);
      P := 0;
      while P < LongWord(Si.lpMaximumApplicationAddress) do begin
        dwRet := VirtualQuery(pointer(P), Mbi, SizeOf(Mbi));
        if (dwRet > 0) and (Mbi.State and MEM_FREE <> 0) then begin
          if Result < Mbi.RegionSize then begin
            Result := Mbi.RegionSize;
            AAddressOfLargest := Mbi.BaseAddress;
          end;
          Inc(P, Mbi.RegionSize);
        end else
          Inc(P, Si.dwPageSize);
      end;
    end;
    

    You can use it like this:

    procedure TForm1.FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
    var
      BaseAddr: pointer;
      MemSize: LongWord;
    begin
      MemSize := GetLargestFreeMemRegion(BaseAddr);
      // allocate dynamic array of this size
      SetLength(fArrayOfBytes, MemSize - 16);
    
      Caption := Format('Largest address block: %u at %p; dynamic array at %p',
        [MemSize, BaseAddr, pointer(@fArrayOfBytes[0])]);
    end;
    

    Note that I had to subtract 16 bytes from the maximum size, presumably because the dynamic array itself uses a few bytes which were allocated from the same chunk of memory, so the next allocation was based on the next multiple of 16.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.