there. I’ve searched my question around here but failed to find anything relevant.
This is the problem.
I have this code in the part of my program, doing kind of stupid sort by inserts.
I developed that in MSVS 2008 and it all worked fine, but when I tried to compile that with g++, it failed because of list::insert function below;
//...
pair<uint, double> NewElem(i, Prob.at(i));
bool inserted(false);
vector<pair<uint, double> >::const_iterator li = NewList.begin();
for ( vector<double>::const_iterator ji = BlocksMemory.begin() ; ji != BlocksMemory.end() ; ++ji)
{
if (NewElem.second <= *ji)
li += _SORT_BLOCK;
else
break;
}
for(;li != NewList.end() ; ++li)
{
if (NewElem.second > li->second)
{
NewList.insert(li, NewElem );
inserted = true;
break;
}
}
as one can see, li is const_iterator of NewList;
And NewElem has type pair with the same content type as NewList contents;
There you can see the response (unreadable):
main.cpp:447: error: no matching function for call to "
std::vector<std::pair<unsigned int, double>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int, double> > >::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<const std::pair<unsigned int, double>*, std::vector<std::pair<unsigned int, double>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int, double> > > >&, std::pair<unsigned int, double>&)"/usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/vector.tcc:106: note: candidates are:
__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc> > std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc> >, const _Tp&) [with _Tp = std::pair<unsigned int, double>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int, double> >]/usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/stl_vector.h:850: note:
void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Tp_alloc_type::pointer, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc> >, size_t, const _Tp&) [with _Tp = std::pair<unsigned int, double>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int, double> >]
What can be the reason? And what is the possible solution?
The signature of the
insertmember function that you are trying to use is probably:But the first argument that you are passing to the function is a
const_iterator, that cannot be implicitly converted to a non constiterator. That code should not have worked on VS either.The simple solution is that if you intend to modify the container you use a non-const
iterator: defineliasstd::vector< std::pair<uint,double> >::iterator li = NewList.begin();