Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 869613
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:20:09+00:00 2026-05-15T10:20:09+00:00

There’s 3 boxes I’m indexing through with a timer. They disappear in sequence. How

  • 0

There’s 3 boxes I’m indexing through with a timer. They disappear in sequence. How do I make them reappear?
Thanks

boxes disappear in sequence 1-3

var pink:Array = ["","boxInstance1","boxInstance2","boxInstance3"];
var timer:Timer = new Timer(555);
timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, onTimer);
timer.start();
function onTimer(evt:TimerEvent):void {
var counting:*;
counting = String(timer.currentCount %10);
trace(counting);
//TIMER LOOPS THROUGH MY ARRAY
this[pink[counting]].visible = false;
}

I tried this ‘it didn’t work’

//THIS IS OK
if(counting> 0){
this[pink[counting]].visible = false;
}
//'null object ref #1010'
if(counting> 6){
this[pink[counting]].visible = true;
}

I’m not to particular about the sequence they disappear and appear, but it need to keep going in a loop.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:20:10+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:20 am

    You’re setting counting to be between 0 and 5 (timer.currentCount %6)

    then you’re only doing your visible = true if counting > 6.

    Counting is never going to be > 6 🙂

    Try checking that it’s >= 3 🙂

    Something like this should work (NB Not tested, written from memory)

    var pink:Array = ["boxInstance1","boxInstance2","boxInstance3"];
    var timer:Timer = new Timer(555);
    timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, onTimer);
    timer.start();
    
    function onTimer(evt:TimerEvent):void {
      var counting:uint = timer.currentCount % this[pink].length;
      this[pink[counting]].visible = !this[pink[counting]].visible;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

(There's a lot of similar questions on this, and I've also read through various
There are many applications in google play that take snapshot , they work without
There is a moment in my app, that I need to force to show
There is a column that exists in 2 tables. In table 1, this column
There's a Rails 3.2.3 web application which doesn't use any database. But in spite
There is a directed graph having a single designated node called root from which
There are two intents on the receiver side which are called from the same
There are nice SO question and answers about this issue, but these options didn't
There are two table s : one is the master and one the detail
There was a similar question posted asking in general about alternatives to Qt. Well,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.