Question

There’s something I don’t quite understand with how references are handled in C++:

B objB = B();                   // Regular B object
const B &refConstObjB = objB;   // Reference to const B object

B* ptrB = new B();              // Regular pointer to B
B* const &refPtrConstB = ptrB;  // Reference to const pointer to B 

All of the above compiles just fine. However the following doesn’t:

const B* &refConstPtrB = ptrB;  // Reference to pointer to const B

Considering both the object and the pointer were declared as non-const, why can I reference the object as a const object, but can’t do the same with the pointer?

Answer 1

Just to note: A const reference does not imply a const object.
It simply means an object that is read-only through that reference. So whether or not an object is const, you can have a read-only reference or pointer to it.

Now, if what you mentioned were allowed, you could say refConstPtrB = pointer_to_some_const_B, and then mutate that object through ptrB, which would violate the const-ness of the pointer’s target.