Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8820079
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T05:31:10+00:00 2026-06-14T05:31:10+00:00

There’s something I don’t understand about anonymous functions using the short notation #(..) The

  • 0

There’s something I don’t understand about anonymous functions using the short notation #(..)

The following works:

REPL>  ((fn [s] s) "Eh")
"Eh"

But this doesn’t:

REPL>  (#(%) "Eh")

This works:

REPL> (#(str %) "Eh")
"Eh"

What I don’t understand is why (#(%) “Eh”) doesn’t work and at the same time I don’t need to use str in ((fn [s] s) “Eh”)

They’re both anonymous functions and they both take, here, one parameter. Why does the shorthand notation need a function while the other notation doesn’t?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T05:31:11+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 5:31 am
    #(...)
    

    is shorthand for

    (fn [arg1 arg2 ...] (...))
    

    (where the number of argN depends on how many %N you have in the body). So when you write:

    #(%)
    

    it’s translated to:

    (fn [arg1] (arg1))
    

    Notice that this is different from your first anonymous function, which is like:

    (fn [arg1] arg1)
    

    Your version returns arg1 as a value, the version that comes from expanding the shorthand tries to call it as a function. You get an error because a string is not a valid function.

    Since the shorthand supplies a set of parentheses around the body, it can only be used to execute a single function call or special form.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There are nice SO question and answers about this issue, but these options didn't
There was a smbmrx sample code using RDBSS in WDK Vista. But since WDK
There are similar questions asked here, but was not able to find something close
There's a Rails 3.2.3 web application which doesn't use any database. But in spite
There was a similar question posted asking in general about alternatives to Qt. Well,
There's a few previous questions on StackOverflow questioning how one goes about accessing local
There is a shared folder in my D drive as works ( D:\works ).
There are are 150 000 records in my comments table and about 1000 new
There are a lot of questions about full-joining in mysql(5.1.36). Of course the solution
There have been multiple questions regarding this topic but I have never really settled

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.