Question

This answer of mine generated some comments claiming that the following construct is not legal C/C++:

void f (int* a) ;
f ((int[]){1,2,3,4,0}) ;

(see this ideone link for a full program). But we weren’t able to resolve the issue. Can anybody shed any light on this? What do the various standards have to say?

Answer 1

It’s valid C99 as far as I can tell – that’s passing a compound literal.

The C99 standard has this as an example (§6.5.2.5/9):

EXAMPLE 1 The file scope definition

int *p = (int []){2, 4};

initializes p to point to the first element of an array of two ints, the first having the value two and the second, four. The expressions in this compound literal are required to be constant. The unnamed object has static storage duration.

Note that the (int []) thing is not a cast here.

This is not a valid C++ construct though, compound literals are not part of the C++ standard (C++11 included). Some compilers allow it as an extension. (GCC does, pass -Wall -pedantic to get a diagnostics about it. IBM xlC allows it as an extension too.)