Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7674873
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T16:50:01+00:00 2026-05-31T16:50:01+00:00

This behaves as wanted: double t = r[1][0] * .5; But this doesn’t: double

  • 0

This behaves as wanted:

double t = r[1][0] * .5;

But this doesn’t:

double t = ((1/2)*r[1][0]);

r is a 2-D Vector.

Just thought of a possibility. Is it because (1/2) is considered an int and (1/2) == 0?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T16:50:03+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 4:50 pm

    Is it because (1/2) is considered an int and (1/2) == 0?

    Yes, both of those literals are of type int, therefore the result will be of type int, and that result is 0.

    Instead, make one of those literals a float or double and you’ll end up with the floating point result of 0.5, ie:

    double t = ((1.0/2)*r[1][0]);

    Because 1.0 is of type double, the int 2 will be promoted to a double and the result will be a double.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is going to be a quick discussion, but I just wanted some feedback
This is a difficult and open-ended question I know, but I thought I'd throw
I want to create a tab/widget/thingymajiggy like the feedback-thing in this picture: That behaves
Google chrome doesn't behave the same as other browsers when encountering this nugget: <?php
This is a bit of a long shot, but if anyone can figure it
This is kinda oddball, but I was poking around with the GNU assembler today
This might seem like a stupid question I admit. But I'm in a small
This is my first post here and I wanted to get some input from
This error just started popping up all over our site. Permission denied to call
So I have declared a vector in my class header like this: ... private:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.