Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4274088
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T07:48:00+00:00 2026-05-21T07:48:00+00:00

This code is from the MapCallouts demo. Say I had hundreds of different annotations.

  • 0

This code is from the MapCallouts demo. Say I had hundreds of different annotations. The way that Apple has done it, it would result in a lot of code duplication.

I want to access the annotation properties of the instance of the class that triggered the delegate, no matter which class instance triggered it.

Is there a simpler way than writing if statements to handle each annotation and have one universal method?

- (MKAnnotationView *)mapView:(MKMapView *)theMapView viewForAnnotation:(id <MKAnnotation>)annotation
    {
        // if it's the user location, just return nil.
        if ([annotation isKindOfClass:[MKUserLocation class]])
            return nil;

        // handle our two custom annotations
        //
        if ([annotation isKindOfClass:[BridgeAnnotation class]]) // for Golden Gate Bridge
        {
            //do something   
        }
        else if ([annotation isKindOfClass:[SFAnnotation class]])   // for City of San Francisco
        {
            //do something
        }

        return nil;
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T07:48:01+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 7:48 am

    You could have all your annotation classes provide some common method, like -annotationView. You might derive all the annotation classes from a common superclass, or just create a protocol. Then, check that the annotation actually responds to the selector, or is a subclass of your common class, and ask it for it’s view:

    if ([annotation respondsToSelector:@selector(annotationView)]) {
        return [annotation annotationView];
    }
    

    or

    if ([annotation isKindOfClass:[AbstractAnnotation class]]) {
        return [annotation annotationView];
    }
    

    One reason not to do that is that the objects you use as annotations are often parts of your data model, and they may not have any business knowing anything about annotation views. It’s one thing to be able to provide a title, subtitle, and location; providing an actual instance of a view is often outside the scope of what a model object should do.

    Keep in mind that annotation views usually don’t do too much other than display a picture and provide the left and right accessories for the callout view. Is it really likely that you’ll need hundreds of different annotation view subclasses? Or can you use a common annotation view for all your annotations, and just configure them differently (such as by changing the annotation view’s image)?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This code is from Prototype.js . I've looked at probably 20 different tutorials, and
I have been playing with the demo code from this msdn article by Jeffrey
So I have this code that takes care of command acknowledgment from remote computers,
If I wrote this code: typeof(myType).TypeHandle Would it use reflection? How much different from:
got this code from a website that helped me in creating buttons and stuff.
I just copied this code from the MIT video lecture that is posted online:
I'm using this code from Microsoft to play audio notifications for my application. It's
hI, I'm trying to get this code from Larry Nyhoff's book to compile in
This is an excerpt of code from a class I am working with in
What does STRAIGHT_JOIN do in this code ? SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN ClosingBalance FROM Accounts WHERE

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.