Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7752889
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T11:54:50+00:00 2026-06-01T11:54:50+00:00

This code shows the structure of what I am trying to do. import multiprocessing

  • 0

This code shows the structure of what I am trying to do.

import multiprocessing
from foo import really_expensive_to_compute_object

## Create a really complicated object that is *hard* to initialise.
T = really_expensive_to_compute_object(10) 

def f(x):
  return T.cheap_calculation(x)

P = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=64)
results = P.map(f, range(1000000))

print results

The problem is that each process starts by spending a lot of time recalculating T instead of using the original T that was computed once. Is there a way to prevent this? T has a fast (deep) copy method, so can I get Python to use that instead of recalculating?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T11:54:51+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 11:54 am

    Why not have f take a T parameter instead of referencing the global, and do the copies yourself?

    import multiprocessing, copy
    from foo import really_expensive_to_compute_object
    
    ## Create a really complicated object that is *hard* to initialise.
    T = really_expensive_to_compute_object(10) 
    
    def f(t, x):
      return t.cheap_calculation(x)
    
    P = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=64)
    results = P.map(f, (copy.deepcopy(T) for _ in range(1000000)), range(1000000))
    
    print results
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this code that shows all the images inside 'images' directory but it
Why this code shows 0? Shouldn't it return 1? Messages = new Meteor.Collection(messages); if
Possible Duplicate: PHP: “Notice: Undefined variable” and “Notice: Undefined index” This code shows warnings
The error shows this code can not rollback: class AddCountToTag < ActiveRecord::Migration def change
I am using this code to display a grid $('#table1 tr').bind('click', shows); function shows()
I am using this code to access the json data. It shows the two
When I run this code: >> I = imread('D:\Works\matlab\SecCode.php.png','png'); >> imshow(I); It always shows
Django code samples involving post data often shows code similar to this: if request.method
Trying to solve this one for a long time, jsfiddle wont re-produce this code
Trying to run this piece of code: void print_matrix(matrix* arg) { int i, j;

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.