Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 661497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T23:16:25+00:00 2026-05-13T23:16:25+00:00

This code works: class Test { public: Test(string name) : _name(name) {}; bool operator()()

  • 0

This code works:

class Test
{
public:
  Test(string name) : _name(name) {};
  bool operator()() { cout << "hello " << _name << endl; return true; }
  string name() { return _name; }
private:
  string _name;
};

pair<string, bool>
inline execute_test(Test* t) {
  return pair<string, bool>(t->name(), (*t)());
}

int main()
{
  vector<Test*> tests;
  vector<pair<string, bool> > results;
  tests.push_back(new Test("Test1"));
  tests.push_back(new Test("Test2"));

  for (unsigned int i=0; i < tests.size(); ++i)
      results.push_back(execute_test(tests[i]));

}

now I want to use trasform instead of the for cicle:

transform(tests.begin(), tests.end(),
          results.begin(),
          execute_test);

but I got a Segmentation Fault. Where is the problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T23:16:25+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:16 pm

    That is because transform is expecting results object to have the required memory allocated i.e. it is expecting results.size() is atleast as big as tests.size(). If you want to push_back operation to be performed on the results then you should use std::back_inserter(results) as the third argument. Otherwise, when transform uses the * output iterator you passed, it will be a invalid memory location and will result in a segmentation fault.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this code which compiles and works as expected: class Right {}; class
EDIT: I realized that this code compiles and works: #include <iostream> template<class Something> class
Code like this works well. Intent configIntent = new Intent (context, WidgetConfigActivity.class); configIntent.putExtra(AppWidgetManager.EXTRA_APPWIDGET_ID, appWidgetId);
How can I make this code work? class Meta @array = [:a,:b] def self.method_missing(name,
Here is the test code that I am using : public class IOConnectDirect extends
Imagine this code: class foo { foo fff; int m_id; f & work() {
This code works well: UIDatePicker *pickerView = [[UIDatePicker alloc] initWithFrame:pickerFrame]; [pickerView addTarget:self action:@selector(pickerChanged:) forControlEvents:UIControlEventValueChanged];
This code works fine in Chrome. However, in Firefox, when it hits the GMxhr
This code works for me except it only checks for a duplicate once, and
This code works well for displaying separate xml items in my main.xml. But is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.