Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 788469
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:22:12+00:00 2026-05-14T21:22:12+00:00

This compiled on VS 2008, but it seems like non-standard usage of templates. template

  • 0

This compiled on VS 2008, but it seems like non-standard usage of templates.

template <class T>
class Foo
{
public:
  void bar(Foo<int> arg)
  {
    // do some stuff here
  }

  // more code ...
};

Is there an issue since the template specialization Foo<int> is contained within the definition of its own template class?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:22:13+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:22 pm

    It’s not really specialisation – you are just saying that function takes a parameter of type Foo <int> – the fact that the function is itself a member of the Foo class isn’t really important. And yes, it’s legal.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I had no problem with this in Visual Studio 2008 but it seems that
This doesn't compile in VSC++ 2008. void* toSendMemory2 = toSendMemory + 4; I am
This code compiled properly on Visual Studio 2010 on Windows, but I'm getting this
Visual C++ is saying my void function needs a return value I compiled this
Sorry for what seems like a silly question: But I've never, ever worked with
I am investigating a problem with C++ class templates. One class template is specialized
This question is specific to the MSVC compiler (specifically 2008), but I'm interested in
I tried to compile Qt+Webkit statically with MS VS 2008 and this worked. C:\Qt\4.6.2>configure
I compiled this (gcc compiler) : #include< stdio.h> main() { unsigned char ch; FILE
I compiled this (gcc compiler): #include <stdio.h> main() { struct { a:1; b:2; }

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.