Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 876971
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:31:35+00:00 2026-05-15T11:31:35+00:00

This compiles: class ReplicatedBaseType { } class NewType: ReplicatedBaseType { } class Document {

  • 0

This compiles:

    class ReplicatedBaseType
    {
    }

    class NewType: ReplicatedBaseType
    {
    }

    class Document
    {
    ReplicatedBaseType BaseObject;

    Document()
    {
     BaseObject = new NewType();
    }
}

But this does not:

    class DalBase<T> : where T: ReplicatedBaseType
    {
    }

    class DocumentTemplate
    {
    DalBase<ReplicatedBaseType> BaseCollection;
    DocumentTemplate ()
    {
    BaseCollection= new DalBase<NewType>(); // Error in this line. It seems this is not possible
    }
    }

What’s the reason?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:31:36+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:31 am

    Variance exists in C# 4.0 targetting .NET 4), but is limited to interfaces and usage of in/out (oh, and arrays of reference-types). For example, to make a covariant sequence:

    class DalBase<T> : IEnumerable<T> where T: ReplicatedBaseType
    {
        public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator() {throw new NotImplementedException();}
        IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
    }
    
    class DocumentTemplate
    {
        IEnumerable<ReplicatedBaseType> BaseCollection;
        DocumentTemplate()
        {
            BaseCollection = new DalBase<NewType>(); // Error in this line. It seems this is not possible
        }
    }
    

    But other than that… no. Stick to either non-generic lists (IList), or use the expected list type.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This compiles fine in Visual studio, but why not in XCode? class A() {};
I have non-template class with a templatized constructor. This code compiles for me. But
I would expect an error inside the copy constructor, but this compiles just fine
This compiles: class Ex1 { public int show() { try { int a=10/10; return
This code compiles: import java.io.Serializable; import java.util.Arrays; class Test<T extends Arrays & Serializable> {
EDIT: I realized that this code compiles and works: #include <iostream> template<class Something> class
I have this code which compiles and works as expected: class Right {}; class
I developed a class that compiles to a dll and my friend uses this
This confuses me. The following compiles fine under Eclipse. package com.example.gotchas; public class GenericHelper1
class Test { enum{}; ... }; Is this empty enum definition portable? Compiles in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.