Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 214939
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:25:20+00:00 2026-05-11T18:25:20+00:00

This compiles: int* p1; const int* p2; p2 = p1; This does not: vector<int*>

  • 0

This compiles:

int* p1;
const int* p2;
p2 = p1;

This does not:

vector<int*> v1;
vector<const int*> v2;
v2 = v1;  // Error!
v2 = static_cast<vector<const int*> >(v1);  // Error!

What are the type equivalence rules for nested const pointers? I thought the conversion would be implicit. Besides, I’d rather not implement point-wise assignment of STL containers, unless I really have to.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:25:21+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:25 pm

    Direct assignment is not possible. As others explained, the equivalence is not established by the pointer types, but by the container types. In this case, vector doesn’t want to accept another vector that has a different, but compatible element type.

    No real problem, since you can use the assign member function:

    v2.assign(v1.begin(), v1.end());
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This following code gets this compile error: " invalid types 'int[int]' for array subscript
In xp 32bit this line compiles with not problem however in vista 64bit this
I am unclear about the following. First, this code compiles fine: #include <vector> typedef
The following code does not want to compile. See the included error message. Code:
This code compiles: private static void Main(string[] args) { bool? fred = true; if
I am a bit confused why this code compiles. I leave out the necessary
I have added some code which compiles cleanly and have just received this Windows
Anyone know this compiler feature? It seems GCC support that. How does it work?
I get an error when I compile this code: using System; public struct Vector2
I once wrote this line in a Java class. This compiled fine in Eclipse

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.