This doesn’t seem to be possible? So what is the best work-around? Expando / dynamic?
public interface ICoOrd {
int x { get; set; }
int y { get; set; }
}
…
ICoOrd a = new {x = 44, y = 55};
ref:
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The best “workaround” is to create and use a normal, “named” type that implements the interface.
But if you insist that an anonymous type be used, consider using a dynamic interface proxy framework like
ImpromptuInterface.