Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6150883
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T19:41:10+00:00 2026-05-23T19:41:10+00:00

This doesn’t work as expected: #define stringify(x) #x printf(Error at line stringify(__LINE__)); This works:

  • 0

This doesn’t work as expected:

#define stringify(x) #x  
printf("Error at line " stringify(__LINE__));

This works:

#define stringify1(x) #x  
#define stringify(x) stringify1(x)  
printf("Error at line " stringify(__LINE__));  

What’s the priority that preprocess uses to expand such macros?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T19:41:10+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:41 pm

    When expanding a macro, the preprocessor expands the macro’s arguments only if those arguments are not subjected to the stringizing (#) or token-pasting (##) operators. So, if you have this:

    #define stringify(x) #x
    stringify(__LINE__)
    

    Then, the preprocessor does not expand __LINE__, because it’s the argument of the stringizing operator. However, when you do this:

    #define stringify1(x) #x
    #define stringify(x) stringify1(x)
    stringify(__LINE__)
    

    Then, when expanding stringify, the preprocessor expands __LINE__ to the current line number, since x is not used with either the stringizing or token-pasting operators in the definition of stringify. It then expands stringify1, and we get what we wanted.

    The relevant language from the C99 standard comes from §6.10.3.1/1:

    After the arguments for the invocation of a function-like macro have been identified, argument substitution takes place. A parameter in the replacement list, unless preceded by a # or ## preprocessing token or followed by a ## preprocessing token (see below), is replaced by the corresponding argument after all macros contained therein have been expanded. Before being substituted, each argument’s preprocessing tokens are completely macro replaced as if they formed the rest of the preprocessing file; no other preprocessing tokens are available.

    Clauses §6.10.3.2 and 6.10.3.3 go on to define the behavior of the # and ## operators respectively.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This doesn't seem to work (compiler complains that Something 's getFoo() method doesn't implement
This doesn't work in my browser - is this normal? It only works when
This doesn't work. I've got an exception from SQL databse that column does not
This works: (+ 1 2 3) 6 This doesn't work: (+ '(1 2 3))
This doesn't work: def register_method(name=None): def decorator(method): # The next line assumes the decorated
This doesn't work: import re re.sub('\\', '/', C:\\Users\\Judge) Error: Traceback (most recent call last):
This doesn't seem to work as I intend. VB.NET: Dim x = Model.Discussions.OrderByDescending(Function(d) d.Messages.OrderByDescending(Function(m)
This doesn't work: INSERT INTO users (username, password) VALUES (Jack,123) WHERE id='1'; Any ideas
This doesn't work: UPDATE customers SET firstname=John AND lastname=Smith WHERE id=1;
this doesn't work: void function(char* var) { var = (char*) malloc (100); } int

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.