This has been a problem that has existed on 3 projects for me.
I have tried the following:
<property name="connection.isolation">ReadCommitted</property>
Set in hibernate.cfg.xml
Using fluent nhiberate:
MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008.IsolationLevel(IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted);
Set in global.asax.cs
I have always been forced to set it like so:
CurrentNhibernateSession.Transaction.Begin(IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted);
which works. (I can see this using NHibernate Profiler)
The problem is now I am using sharp architecture and transaction.begin is called inside that framework and I am having trouble rebuilding it.
Is there a way to do this that works without explicitly setting it when you begin a transaction?
Are you certain that this is the case? If you’re only verifying the isolation level by what NHProf is telling you; that could be a problem. Remember that NHProf is only reporting what the logging infrastructure in NHibernate feeds it. Perhaps the isolation level message isn’t sent when you open a transaction with the default? This could probably be verified by investigating the NHibernate source.
I would suggest using an alternate means to verify the transaction level (perhaps SQL Profiler?) before concluding that this isn’t working as expected.
Edit:
I’ve had a look at the NHibernate source and can verify my hunch above. If you have a look at the AdoTransaction source you’ll note that it is logging an isolation level of IsolationLevel.Unspecified when a transaction is started without specifying a specific isolation level.
However, the actual transaction is being started with the isolation level specified in the config a few lines down as such:
So, it would seem that NHProf is not being entirely accurate in this instance.
Update:
It appears this has been fixed in the trunk version of NHibernate, so I’m guessing this is no longer an issue with NHibernate 3.xx.