Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8376023
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T15:19:32+00:00 2026-06-09T15:19:32+00:00

this.HasRequired(t => t.Parent) .WithMany(t => t.Children) .HasForeignKey(d => d.ParentId); Here I defined a basic

  • 0
this.HasRequired(t => t.Parent)
    .WithMany(t => t.Children)
    .HasForeignKey(d => d.ParentId);

Here I defined a basic 1-to-many relationship. What if I do not want to have Children property exposed at all in Model, but still want to have synchronization of values between Parent and ParentId. How would I go defining such “relationship”?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T15:19:33+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 3:19 pm

    You will call WithMany without any parameter:

    this.HasRequired(t => t.Parent)
        .WithMany()
        .HasForeignKey(d => d.ParentId);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple 1:many aggregate relationship, lets say: public class Parent { public
I have this problem: have two entyties with one to one relationship, boot of
I have an optional relationship from a Child to a Parent class. I would
this is my first question in here, and I would like to ask if
This should be a simple one: I have an observableArray object called To in
I have a couple of classes (for this example anyway) that use code first
I started using EF 4.1 code first. I have a entity table like this:
Summary I have three classes: Account SpecialAccount (inherits from Account ) Profile (0..1 relationship
In a situation where you have a parent class which has one child class,
This is a sample scenario. I have an existing database consisting of tables as

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.