Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8172959
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T21:57:43+00:00 2026-06-06T21:57:43+00:00

This is a copy of the this post: Brace Enclosed Initializer List As Function

  • 0

This is a copy of the this post: Brace Enclosed Initializer List As Function Argument, though I am looking for a solution using only methods available in C. I am using the Windows 8 compiler.

Basically, I’m looking to do something like this:

HANDLE hThread1 = CreateThread(...);
HANDLE hThread2 = CreateThread(...);
HANDLE hThread3 = CreateThread(...);

...

WaitForMultipleObjects( 3, {hThread1,hThread2,hThread3}, FALSE, INFINITE );

instead of this:

HANDLE hThread[3];
hThread[0] = CreateThread(...);
hThread[1] = CreateThread(...);
hThread[2] = CreateThread(...);

...

WaitForMultipleObjects( 3, hThread, FALSE, INFINITE );



foo(arg1, arg2, {arg3_1, arg3_2});
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T21:57:45+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 9:57 pm

    C99 provides compound literals, which would give you what you want:

    WaitForMultipleObjects( 3,
                            (HANDLE*){hThread1, hThread2, hThread3},
                            FALSE,
                            INFINITE );
    

    Unfortunately, Microsoft has said that they have no interest in supporting any C standard past C90, except for those features that happen to be part of C++ (and C++ doesn’t have compound literals).

    You could write a variadic function that builds an array of HANDLEs and returns a pointer to its first element. A call then might look like:

    WaitForMultipleObjects( 3,
                            HandleList(3, hThread1, hThread2, hThread3),
                            FALSE,
                            INFINITE );
    

    But then you have the usual problems of managing the memory allocated for the array.

    C90 doesn’t provide a particularly clean way of doing what you want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was reading this post on tail recursion. I'll copy the posted solution: unsigned
I have been using this copy method for quite a while, in lots of
This loop works fine in Main function but when copy this loop code in
I have a function ClassA::FuncA(const char *filePath) and want to copy this const char
in post: Copy sublist from list was stayed explained me that for copy a
I am using the web2py ajax function, like this: In index.html {{=INPUT(_name='total_buy', _onkeyup= ajax('key',['total_buy'],
I saw this post and tried to copy it but it didn't work -
Taking advice from this post , I purchased a copy of 'The C Programming
when this copy constructor is called in my application, this copy constructor goes into
So, I have started with this: copy | dir /s /b | find myFile

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.