Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 458007
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T22:37:41+00:00 2026-05-12T22:37:41+00:00

This is a follow on from another question, my question is regarding the use

  • 0

This is a follow on from another question, my question is regarding the use of the retain/release in main(). From my understanding in this simple example the retain/release statements are not needed. BUT in more complex situations its best practice to add them as it ensures that the planet instance is not released unexpectedly.

+(Planet *) planet {
    gPlanetCount++;
    //return [[[Planet alloc] init] autorelease];
    return [[[self alloc] init] autorelease];     // Better
}

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
    NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];

    Planet *outerMost;

    outerMost = [[Planet planet] retain];
    ...
    ... some code
    ...
    [outerMost release]; 
    [pool drain];
    return 0;
}

EDIT_001

So I could better write the above as.

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
    NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];

    Planet *outerMost;

    outerMost = [Planet planet];
    ...
    ... some code
    ...
    [pool drain];
    return 0;
}

cheers gary

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T22:37:42+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:37 pm

    Markus Müller’s comment is correct, that is, your code is correct, except for the missing pool allocation and initialization.

    However, if you create an autoreleased object in a routine/method, and you use that object in that routine/method, and you are done with it, before you exit that routine/method, then there is no reason to retain it and then release it. That object is guaranteed to be retained for the duration of the life of the routine/method, and, in this case, it will most likely be released by the [pool drain] method.

    You are not going to have a situation where outerMost is released unexpectedly. The expected release is in [pool drain]. It doesn’t matter how many other methods are called from within main(), as long as you are sicking to the retain/release guidelines, outerMost will not need to be retained.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a follow on from another question i made I have this query
This is a follow up question from another post but that post was answered.
This is a follow on from another question ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10712659/c-class-design-for-monte-carlol-simulation ) I am planning
This is a follow up from a question of mine that was just answered
This is a follow on from my previous question although this is about something
This is a follow-on from this question, in which I was trying to suppress
I am trying to follow this example (from p137 of Rob Pickering's Foundations of
This is a follow-on question from the one I asked here . Can constraints
This question is a follow on from this one ... I am binding to
This is a follow up from my question: MySQL: Querying a table and possibly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.