Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8206519
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T08:42:04+00:00 2026-06-07T08:42:04+00:00

This is a follow-up question from Antlr superfluous Predicate required? where I stated my

  • 0

This is a follow-up question from Antlr superfluous Predicate required? where I stated my problem in a simplified way, however it could not be solved there.
I have the following grammar and when I delete the {true}?=> predicates, the text is not recognized anymore. The input string is MODULE main LTLSPEC H {} {} {o} FALSE;. Note that the trailing ; is not tokenized as EOC, but as IGNORE. When I add {true}?=> to the EOC rule ; is tokenized as EOC.
I tried this from command-line with antlr-v3.3 and v3.4 without difference. Thanks in advance, I appreciate your help.

grammar NusmvInput;

options {
  language = Java;
}    
@parser::members{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
    NusmvInputLexer lexer = new NusmvInputLexer(new ANTLRStringStream("MODULE main LTLSPEC H {} {} {o} FALSE;"));
    NusmvInputParser parser = new NusmvInputParser(new CommonTokenStream(lexer));
    parser.specification();
  }
}    
@lexer::members{
    private boolean inLTL = false;
} 

specification : 
     module+ EOF
     ;
module : 
    MODULE module_decl    
    ;

module_decl : 
    NAME parameter_list ;
parameter_list 
    : ( LP (parameter ( COMMA parameter )*)? RP )?
    ;    
parameter
    : (NAME | INTEGER )
    ;    
/**************
*** LEXER
**************/
COMMA
    :{!inLTL}?=> ','
    ; 
OTHER 
    : {!inLTL}?=>( '&' | '|' | 'xor' | 'xnor' | '=' | '!' |
     '<' | '>' | '-' | '+' | '*' | '/' |
      'mod' | '[' | ']' | '?')
      ;     
RCP
      : {!inLTL}?=>'}'
      ;      
LCP
      : {!inLTL}?=>'{'
      ;
LP 
    : {!inLTL}?=>'('
    ;
RP 
    : {!inLTL}?=>')'
    ;   
MODULE
    : {true}?=> 'MODULE' {inLTL = false;}
    ;
LTLSPEC
    : {true}?=> 'LTLSPEC' 
    {inLTL = true; skip(); }
    ;  
EOC 
    : ';' 
    {
        if (inLTL){
            inLTL = false;
            skip();
        }
    }
    ;   
WS 
    : (' ' | '\t' | '\n' | '\r')+ {$channel = HIDDEN;} 
    ;
COMMENT 
    :  '--' .* ('\n' | '\r') {$channel = HIDDEN;} 
    ; 
INTEGER 
    : {!inLTL}?=> ('0'..'9')+
    ;
NAME 
    :{!inLTL}?=> ('A'..'Z' | 'a'..'z') ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '0'..'9' | '_' | '$' | '#' | '-')*
    ;
IGNORE
    : {inLTL}?=> . {skip();}
    ;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T08:42:05+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 8:42 am

    It seems that without a predicate before MODULE and LTLSPEC, the NAME gets precedence over them even if these tokens are defined before the NAME token. Whether this is by design or a bug, I don’t know.

    However, the way you’re trying to solve it seems rather complicated. As far as I can see, you seem to want to ignore (or skip) input starting with LTLSPEC and ending with a semi colon. Why not do something like this instead:

    specification  : module+ EOF;
    module         : MODULE module_decl;
    module_decl    : NAME parameter_list;
    parameter_list : (LP (parameter ( COMMA parameter )*)? RP)?;    
    parameter      : (NAME | INTEGER);    
    
    MODULE  : 'MODULE';
    LTLSPEC : 'LTLSPEC' ~';'* ';' {skip();};
    COMMA   : ','; 
    OTHER   : ( '&' | '|' | 'xor' | 'xnor' | '=' | '!' |
                '<' | '>' | '-' | '+' | '*' | '/' |
               'mod' | '[' | ']' | '?')
            ;     
    RCP     : '}';      
    LCP     : '{';
    LP      : '(';
    RP      : ')';   
    EOC     : ';';   
    WS      : (' ' | '\t' | '\n' | '\r')+ {$channel = HIDDEN;};
    COMMENT : '--' .* ('\n' | '\r') {$channel = HIDDEN;}; 
    INTEGER : ('0'..'9')+;
    NAME    : ('A'..'Z' | 'a'..'z') ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '0'..'9' | '_' | '$' | '#' | '-')*;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a follow up question from Problem with array assignment I now have
This is a follow up question from Safe in C# not in C++, simple
This is a follow up question from Calling constructor in return statement . This
This is a follow-on question from the one I asked here . Can constraints
This is a follow up from a question of mine that was just answered
This is a follow-on from this question, in which I was trying to suppress
This is a follow up from my previous question I have this code basically
This is a follow-on from a previous SO question Anchoring CSS Repeating Background Image
This is a follow on from my previous question although this is about something
This question is a follow on from this one ... I am binding to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.