Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3843894
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T16:00:12+00:00 2026-05-19T16:00:12+00:00

This is a homework question, so I would like to avoid complete answers and

  • 0

This is a homework question, so I would like to avoid complete answers and much prefer hints if possible.

Given an array of random integers A[1…x], the program should return the first y array elements in incrementing order where 1<=y<=sqrt(x). So, basically, given an array [5,9,2,8] and y=2, the program should return [2,5].

The “sort first, return first y items” answer is out the window since the best we can do is n*logn time with merge or quicksort. The answer thus has to make use of the fact that we only return at most sqrt(x) items, and the only other answer I have so far is doing a for-loop search for the minimum element in the array, removing the minimum from the array, stashing it in a new array, say B, and repeating the process on the now smaller modified version of A of length x-1, which gives us running time like so:

x + (x-1) + (x-2) + ... + (x-y)

That counts the number of for-loop iteration of the min-search, and gives us at most y or sqrt(x) iterations in the worst case scenario, and there are at most x items in the array. So we have sqrt(x)*x, which is better than O(n*logn) but still not quite O(n) :/.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T16:00:13+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 4:00 pm

    Hint: Suppose you had an O(n) time algorithm to pick the yth element…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.