Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7010627
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T22:00:59+00:00 2026-05-27T22:00:59+00:00

This is a question about using an object-oriented language. I’ve been using C++ to

  • 0

This is a question about using an object-oriented language. I’ve been using C++ to solve Project Euler for a while, and I recently read in an article that a lot of people treat C++ like a procedural language, since you can get away without creating classes. I’ve been doing exactly that.

My question is whether it’s “bad” to just be writing functions in an object-oriented languageint mult_order(int base, int mod) for multiplicative order, gcd(int a, int b) for gcd, but without putting them in a class). I’ve been “reinventing the wheel” a lot for the purpose of learning–should I put them in a library, or create a Math class or something along those lines?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T22:01:00+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:01 pm

    From what I’ve been taught (and what I’ve experienced), the underlying idea behind OOP is a simple one:

    Use it when it makes your life easier.

    It could easily be the case that, for your purpose, using a class wouldn’t make things easier – you don’t have a reason to repeatedly access a single object that performs these mathematical operations – or creating a class would create unnecessary overhead.

    For your example, I think you’ll be fine without objects, but do consider that somewhere in the future, it may be necessary to create an object that can handle those operations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been thinking about this object oriented design question for a while now and
This question is about using getter methods of a singleton object in worker threads.
I have a question about using new[] . Imagine this: Object.SomeProperty = new[] {string1,
This is a question about the VB.NET language. Since I am using it every
This recent question about sorting randomly using C# got me thinking about the way
I have seen this question about deploying to WebSphere using the WAS ant tasks.
From this question , a neat answer about using COALESCE to simplify complex logic
In this question , I asked about using queue's and threads in C#. I
This question came about because the cells gem specifies template directories using File.join('app','cells'). That
(NOTE: This question is not about escaping queries, it's about escaping results) I'm using

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.