Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 673547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:36:27+00:00 2026-05-14T00:36:27+00:00

This is a short question. At some point my thread understand that it should

  • 0

This is a short question. At some point my thread understand that it should suicide. What is the best way to do it:

  1. Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
  2. return;

By the way, why in the first case we need to use currentThread? Is Thread does not refer to the current thread?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:36:28+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:36 am

    If you want to terminate the thread, then just returning is fine. You do NOT need to call Thread.currentThread().interrupt() (it will not do anything bad though. It’s just that you don’t need to.) This is because interrupt() is basically used to notify the owner of the thread (well, not 100% accurate, but sort of). Because you are the owner of the thread, and you decided to terminate the thread, there is no one to notify, so you don’t need to call it.

    By the way, why in the first case we
    need to use currentThread? Is Thread
    does not refer to the current thread?

    Yes, it doesn’t. I guess it can be confusing because e.g. Thread.sleep() affects the current thread, but Thread.sleep() is a static method.

    If you are NOT the owner of the thread (e.g. if you have not extended Thread and coded a Runnable etc.) you should do

    Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
    return;
    

    This way, whatever code that called your runnable will know the thread is interrupted = (normally) should stop whatever it is doing and terminate. As I said earlier, it is just a mechanism of communication though. The owner might simply ignore the interrupted status and do nothing.. but if you do set the interrupted status, somebody might thank you for that in the future.

    For the same reason, you should never do

    Catch(InterruptedException ie){
         //ignore
    }
    

    Because if you do, you are stopping the message there. Instead one should do

    Catch(InterruptedException ie){
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt();//preserve the message
        return;//Stop doing whatever I am doing and terminate
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that this is a very broad question, but a short it depends
This is a really short question I think but I'm not sure I understand
In short: is there some way I can modify a class definition such that
I have a short question i have wrote this in java. Old code: class
I have a short question. I want do put this \tssr>&\8=f23' into a String
I feel rather foolish as this is just a short question. I was reading
This question will be short and sweet. I know an instruction can occur between
The short version of the question - why can't I do this? I'm restricted
This is basically a rails 3 version of this question . Short of parsing
I've found an answer to a previous question about javascript short hand for this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.